It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I don't care how much you've played or how good your aim is - If you haven't touched the game at least twice in three months then I see your "opinion" as hot moot.
rigorousIncrease wrote: »
*Early access* "We have to test the update first, even tho its in a playable state"
I love you SD, and I love you DB, but instead of literally confirming that you are using Early Access as an excuse for @$!# up, how about USE IT and patch and hotfix the update and tune it WITH the players, instead of pushing the update then having stuff go wrong, then not say anything about it for a fortnight, and have people screaming at you.... js
bontsa wrote: »
Early Access, @rigorousIncrease ? You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.
bontsa wrote: »
@rigorousIncrease Phrase-wise it was merely a lousy movie-liner /meme I quoted, so not that much about grammatical correctness
While your frustration is understandable taken the history of patches, SD has actually quite well layered ways of testing. Utilising everything that all of them offer properly is what is lacking if anything. They have their internal QA, then there is Private Test Server group, and then the Beta testing in live build. The last part is what most people seem to forget all the time sadly, they (not saying that you necessarily) seem to expect triple-A title level of polished product for some insane reasons. Hah, even those have bugs creeping in but you ain't hearing whines for some reason.
Have a like for admitting your (very) little error though!