Welp at least we tried !

http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
yup. Don't you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?

Comments

  • DjiesseDjiesse mtl.qc.caPosts: 830Genome Editor
    Seems fair to me to call it a draw, it's not like it will happen very often.
  • SzakalotSzakalot Posts: 3,173
    http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
    yup. Don't you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?

    Why? is the first objective somehow more relevant? As far as the game-logic is concerned its about the end goal: whether the final objective was completed. And if nobody managed that, then how fast the pre-final was completed.

    Perfect draw scenario.
    First!

    48px-First_Blood.png?version=ee44701eadae9f5eb7db0d17c0edc6c9
  • BreezerBreezer Posts: 33
    edited April 2015
    Szakalot wrote: »
    http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
    yup. Don't you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?

    Why? is the first objective somehow more relevant? As far as the game-logic is concerned its about the end goal: whether the final objective was completed. And if nobody managed that, then how fast the pre-final was completed.

    Perfect draw scenario.

    Both team manage to blow up the last objective wich mean both team achive their goal !

    I feel like if both team manage to do the 1st objective at the same time and dont complete the end goal the teams should get a DRAW.

    But when both teams win the end goal there should be something coming out from other objective. It add a little spice !
  • This scenario seems OK to me. No need for a tie-breaker. One team is allowed to facepalm while the other goes "YES WE DENIED THEM THE WIN!!!!"
Sign In or Register to comment.